AdCP 3.2 beta program
The 3.2 beta cycle started with a protocol-first checkpoint. The current TypeScript SDK beta now consumes the exact signed beta.3 bundle:
Earlier betas remain useful as pinned implementation checkpoints. For new
TypeScript testing, pair SDK beta.4 with protocol beta.3. Do not combine a newer
wire pin with an SDK generated from an older bundle unless the SDK maintainer
explicitly documents forward compatibility.
Know which version string to use
The artifact version, wire pin, and documentation selector are related but not interchangeable:
Only send a prerelease wire pin to a peer that advertises that exact value in
get_adcp_capabilities.adcp.supported_versions. Prerelease pins are exact: a
buyer pinned to "3.2-beta.3" must not silently negotiate to another beta, and
a stable "3.2" pin must not silently negotiate to a beta.
Use the TypeScript SDK beta
The TypeScript SDK is the first package with exact beta.3 support. The npmlatest tag remains on SDK 13, so opt into the preview explicitly:
Use the beta.3 artifact directly
Download the signed beta.3 protocol bundle rather than copying schemas frommain or from the moving /schemas/3.0.26/ path:
adcp-3.2.0-beta.3/ directory contains:
manifest.json— release version, bundle contents, skills, and file count;schemas/— source-shaped and bundled request/response schemas, includingschemas/manifest.jsonfor the task and capability inventory;compliance/— storyboards, test kits, vectors, and runner contracts;skills/— role guidance for coding agents;openapi/— published OpenAPI artifacts.
- Generate or refresh types from the pinned bundled schemas.
- Validate representative requests and responses for the roles you implement.
- Compare your advertised tools with
schemas/manifest.json. - Exercise raw MCP or A2A calls with
adcp_version: "3.2-beta.3"against a staging peer that advertises the same pin. - Run the compliance assets with a source-compatible runner if you maintain one. Do not weaken production authentication to accommodate a beta runner.
No 3.2 verification badge is currently issued for beta.3. Treat it as an
implementation input, not a certification target.
SDK support contract
An SDK support claim must name all of the following:- exact SDK package version;
- exact AdCP prerelease bundle used to generate or load schemas;
- supported roles and transports;
- known unsupported or raw-only surfaces;
- install command and one tested validation command.
Current beta.3 checkpoint
Protocol beta.1, beta.2, and beta.3 are published, and TypeScript SDK beta.4 embeds the exact beta.3 bundle. Before treating a test result as beta.3 integration evidence, confirm that:- the support matrix names the exact SDK package and beta.3 protocol bundle;
- both peers advertise
"3.2-beta.3"before calls use that pin; - the integration scenarios below run against beta.3 and retain the exact package and bundle versions;
- copy/paste installation and validation commands have been executed as published;
- any unsupported Python or Go surface is reported as unavailable or raw-only, rather than inferred from TypeScript support.
Required integration evidence
Retain the exact protocol bundle, SDK package versions, capability responses, redacted requests/responses, task IDs, proposal and MediaBuy revisions, creative IDs, warnings, and delivery readbacks for each run.Buyer and seller lifecycle
- Discover the exact prerelease and capability gates.
- Use
list_productsor the advertised proposal flow, preserving the returned targeting and canonicalformat_options[]contract. - Validate or preview a matching creative when the relevant capability is advertised.
- Commit with
buy_productsoraccept_proposal; do not put creative bodies into either compact purchase call. - Traffic and assign the creative through
sync_creativesfor a library-backed seller, or the seller’s advertised inline compatibility path. - Exercise one revision-checked operational action with
control_media_buy. - Reconcile
get_media_buys,get_media_buy_delivery, and, when advertised,get_creative_deliverythrough a non-zero delivery result or a documented no-delivery state.
Generative creative lifecycle
- Discover a build capability and, when applicable, an account-scoped transformer.
- Run brief →
build_creative→ validation →preview_creative, retaining the selected capability and generated manifest lineage. - Run a pre-flight seller validation or dry-run sync, then purchase/accept and sync the materialized creative with its package assignment.
- Observe the live campaign readback and fetch MediaBuy delivery plus
get_creative_deliverywhen the seller advertises it. Pass the servedcreatives[].variants[].manifestback topreview_creativefor a post-flight re-render, retainingcreative_id,variant_id, and manifest lineage. Do not claim pixel-identical replay unless the renderer explicitly guarantees it.
What may still change
The 3.2.0 milestone is the live scope record for work that may still land during the beta cycle. Use these maintained GitHub views instead of a copied issue list: Milestone assignment means candidate for the 3.2 line, not a commitment to the next beta or GA. A change is included in a beta only when it is merged before that beta’s tag. Items may be deferred, split, or moved to a later release as working groups resolve scope and interoperability risk.Known beta boundaries
- Targeting-aware behavior may be present in schemas before every reference or training agent implements it. Capability declarations remain authoritative.
- Experimental surfaces retain their experimental-status contract. A 3.2 beta does not graduate them to stable.
- The
3.2-betadocumentation selector moves forward; pinned semver artifacts and documentation snapshots remain immutable. - Stable schema aliases continue to resolve to stable releases during beta. Use pinned prerelease URLs when validating beta behavior.
Report useful feedback
Include this information in a beta issue:- protocol artifact version and wire pin;
- SDK name/version, or
raw wire; - buyer, seller, creative, signals, brand, measurement, or governance role;
- transport and task name;
- schema path or JSON Pointer involved;
- expected and actual behavior;
- minimal redacted payload and validation error;
- whether the problem blocks beta.3 interoperability.