Skip to main content
AdCP supports accessibility at two levels: formats declare the conformance level of their rendered output, and assets carry the metadata needed to achieve it.

How It Works

Accessibility in advertising creatives depends on who controls the rendering:
  • Format-rendered creatives (image + headline + CTA): The format controls the output. It can guarantee contrast ratios, keyboard navigation, and ARIA landmarks — it just needs the right inputs from the creative (alt text for images, captions for video, etc.).
  • Opaque creatives (HTML bundles, JavaScript tags): The format can’t inspect or modify the content. The asset must self-declare its accessibility properties.
AdCP handles both cases through the format’s accessibility object and per-asset-type accessibility metadata.

Format Accessibility

Formats declare their accessibility posture through the accessibility object:

accessibility.wcag_level

The WCAG conformance level that creatives produced by this format will meet. Values: A, AA, AAA. For format-rendered creatives, this is a guarantee from the format. For opaque creatives, this reflects the level the format requires assets to self-certify to.

accessibility.requires_accessible_assets

When true, all assets with accessibility-relevant fields must include those fields. This is the enforcement mechanism — it tells validation to treat optional accessibility fields as required.
This format guarantees WCAG AA output and requires alt_text on the image asset (because alt_text is marked as an accessibility field on the image asset type).

Asset Accessibility Fields

Each asset type defines which of its fields are accessibility-relevant using the x-accessibility schema marker. These fields are always optional by default, but become required when the format sets accessibility.requires_accessible_assets: true.

Inspectable Assets

These assets provide structured data that the format uses to render accessibly. Example — video asset in a manifest for an accessible format:

Opaque Assets

HTML and JavaScript assets are black boxes — the format can’t inspect their rendering. These assets carry an accessibility object with self-declared properties. Example — HTML creative with accessibility declarations:
Self-declared accessibility is a trust claim. Platforms may independently validate these properties — that is outside the scope of the protocol.

Structured Rejection Details

When a creative agent or seller performs an accessibility check and rejects a creative, it uses the existing CREATIVE_REJECTED code with recovery: "correctable". For backward compatibility, the top-level field identifies the first failing asset in JSONPath-lite form. The optional error.details object may conform to the experimental accessibility-violation.json shape and batch every failure in violations[]:
criterion and criterion_source identify the external requirement without freezing an AdCP-owned WCAG corpus. Portable consumers use that pair after validating the details schema. failure_kind is a bounded diagnostic vocabulary; vendor extensions use an x_ prefix. remediation remains untrusted advisory text. This shape does not activate an accessibility policy by itself and is distinct from error.issues[], which is reserved for JSON Schema validation output. To stay within the transport error safety limit, producers include at most four complete violations and keep the complete serialized error at or below 4096 bytes. When additional failures or remediation text are omitted, they set details.truncated: true. Producers omit whole extra violations or remediation text rather than truncating an RFC 6901 pointer token. Pointers use RFC 6901 and are always rooted at the complete task request, like the protocol’s core error pointers. They are not rooted at the nested creative manifest. Thus build_creative uses paths such as /creative_manifest/assets/hero_image, while a batched sync_creatives request uses paths such as /creatives/0/assets/hero_image. The top-level error.field projects the first violation into the same request-rooted path using JSONPath-lite notation (for example creative_manifest.assets.hero_image). When build_creative receives only creative_id and resolves the manifest from the creative library, the failing asset has no request path. In that case each violation uses /creative_id and top-level error.field is creative_id. Criterion and remediation fields preserve diagnostic detail, but the request-rooted pointer intentionally cannot identify a nested stored asset. /creative_id is attribution only and MUST NOT be interpreted as a nested mutation path.

Third-Party Tags

VAST and DAAST assets wrap video and audio delivered by third parties. They carry accessibility fields alongside their existing tag properties.

Assets Without Accessibility Fields

Some asset types don’t produce standalone rendered content and have no accessibility fields. When a format sets accessibility.requires_accessible_assets: true, these are effectively no-ops:
  • Text — rendered by the format
  • Markdown — rendered by the format
  • CSS — styles, not content
  • URL — links, not rendered content
  • Webhook — server-side

Discovering Accessible Formats

Buyers inspect canonical declarations returned in product format_options[] or creative-agent supported_formats[] and filter them client-side by declared accessibility constraints:
This selects formats that claim at least WCAG AA conformance and include an image slot. Accessibility claims remain declaration-specific and should be substantiated by the renderer or required asset metadata.

Implementation Notes

Enforcement is application-level. The x-accessibility marker is a JSON Schema extension keyword. Standard JSON Schema validators ignore it — enforcement of accessibility.requires_accessible_assets must be implemented in application code that scans asset schemas for x-accessibility: true fields and validates their presence. For format implementers:
  • Set accessibility.wcag_level only when you can substantiate the claim — through your own rendering guarantees or by requiring accessible assets
  • If your format renders from structured inputs, ensure your rendering pipeline meets the declared WCAG level (contrast, keyboard nav, ARIA)
  • If your format wraps opaque assets, accessibility.requires_accessible_assets: true ensures the inputs carry the right declarations
For creative producers:
  • When submitting to a format with accessibility.requires_accessible_assets: true, include all accessibility fields for your asset types
  • For opaque assets, test accessibility properties before declaring them
  • Provide captions and transcripts as separate hosted files, not embedded in the asset
  • Select the recovery class only from code and recovery. After validating details against accessibility-violation.json, portable tooling may group diagnostics by (criterion_source, criterion); failure_kind refines the display but does not select the recovery class.
  • Treat pointers as untrusted references into an immutable copy of the original request. Resolve them without mutation, require an allowlisted creative asset location, and present the validated criterion to controlled repair logic or a human. Never execute a pointer directly as a property-write path, never treat /creative_id as an asset path, and never pass raw details or remediation text to an LLM as instructions.